In partnership with
Good morning and welcome to the Hodl Report
Strap in, because this Tuesday’s edition of The Hodl Report is serving up two heavy servings of crypto theatre. First, we’re peeling back the curtain on the “decentralization” story many in the space keep telling themselves. Spoiler: the script might be a little more centralized than you’d like. Then tune in as the courtroom lights go on for the MIT-educated brothers who pulled off a lightning-fast $25 million bot-battle heist on Ethereum and somehow walked away with a mistrial.
We also want to talk about MEV today.
If you’ve ever made a trade on-chain and felt like someone peeked at your order and jumped the line—congrats, you’ve met MEV. Maximal Extractable Value is the dark magic of crypto markets, where bots frontrun, sandwich, and siphon profits straight out of your swaps before you even hit refresh. It’s like trying to buy concert tickets, only to have scalpers buy yours mid-click and resell them for a dollar more—on your own screen. The good news? CoWSwap flips the script. Their batch auction model kills frontrunning and saves you gas. Go see how it works before the bots do.
Swap Without MEV
Protect your swaps from MEV. CoW Swap stops bots from jumping your order, reducing slippage and failed transactions. Keep more of what you trade with execution you can trust. Trade smarter.
Editors Corner
🕶️ The Great Decentralization LARP
Every project in crypto starts with the same promise: we’re building something truly decentralized.
Then, a few months later, you realize that “decentralized” really means three wallets, two VCs, and one guy with commit access.
Let’s be honest. Decentralization has become crypto’s most overused and least understood word. Everyone wants the credibility of being decentralized without the actual inconvenience of giving up control. Governance tokens are concentrated, multisigs are managed by insiders, and “community votes” are often theater for decisions already made in group chats.
What we really have is “decentralization theater.” It looks good, it sounds good, and it makes for a great slide deck. But scratch the surface, and most of the power still lives with a handful of whales, founders, and market makers.
And that’s fine — at least, if we stop pretending otherwise.
Building coordination systems at scale is hard. Someone has to write code, patch bugs, and make decisions. The problem isn’t that decentralization is hard; it’s that pretending we’ve already achieved it blinds us to how centralized we actually are.
The healthiest projects admit it. They publish governance distributions, hand over treasury control slowly, and design incentive systems that trend toward decentralization instead of claiming it from day one.
Everyone else? They keep the narrative, ditch the principle, and call it “community-driven.”
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: decentralization is not a binary state. It’s a spectrum, and most of crypto is still standing on the centralized end of it — waving the flag and hoping no one checks the multisig.
So yeah, decentralization is the north star. But right now, most of us are still pretending to be astronauts.
Crypto Trivia: Beeple Breaks the Art World
Want to take advantage of the current bull run?
If you want to take advantage of the current bull market but are hesitant about investing, online stock brokers could help take the intimidation out of the process. These platforms offer a simpler, user-friendly way to buy and sell stocks, options and ETFs from the comfort of your home. Check out Money’s list of the Best Online Stock Brokers and start putting your money to work!
Today’s Report
Too Smart to Convict? Mistrial for MIT Duo in $25M Bot Battle
🚨 Our Report
The courtroom saga just got an unexpected twist: a federal jury in Manhattan couldn’t agree on the fate of brothers James Peraire‑Bueno and Anton Peraire‑Bueno — accused of pulling off a lightning‑fast $25 million crypto swindle in just 12 seconds. After three days of deliberations, tears, sleepless nights, and mounting confusion, the judge called a mistrial. The case is far from over — but the first act ended in a stalemate.
🔓 Key Points
James (29) and Anton (25), both MIT‑educated, stood charged with wire fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering for allegedly orchestrating a $25 million maneuver on the Ethereum blockchain in April 2023.
Prosecutors say they used bots and a “bait‑and‑switch” via preprogrammed trades: lure other bots, poison the block, then siphon off the funds.
Defense claims their bot‑on‑bot strategy was a competitive, legal play in crypto trading — they argue innovation, not crime.
Jurors repeatedly asked for clarification on basic legal standards like “misrepresentation,” “willful intent,” and “beyond a reasonable doubt” — signaling confusion over how these apply to code and bots.
The mistrial is the third knock for enforcement in big crypto fraud cases this year, pointing to a larger problem: proving intent and trickery in automated systems is messy.
🔐 Relevance & Takeaway
If you’re tracking crypto enforcement trends, this case is a canary in the coal mine — and it just coughed. The stalled verdict underscores how ill‑equipped traditional legal frameworks are when the “victims” are bots, the “victims” of bots, and the “device” is a decentralized blockchain. For traders and market watchers, this signals a few important things:
Enforcement won’t wait silently: The U.S. is keen to show it can prosecute crypto schemes — even ones built purely from code, logic, and milliseconds‑long trades.
But legal clarity is lacking: What exactly counts as fraud when you’re trading bots against bots, in a market built for speed and automation? This case exposes the gap.
Market implications: Until the law catches up, there’s ambiguity around what’s “just fast trading” versus “criminal exploit.” That uncertainty adds a risk premium for participants and could affect how protocols, validators, and institutional players structure their activities.
Narrative shift: The winners aren’t just those who coded fastest — but those operating where legal, regulatory, and technical lines blur.
In short: innovation is sprinting ahead; oversight is still limping to keep up. That creates space for profit, but also for misstep. Stay sharp.
Today’s Top News
HEADLINES
Trump’s tariff “dividend” revival raises crypto‑liquidity hopes — The announced ~$2,000 payout to Americans via tariffs is seen as stimulus by some analysts — could spark crypto upside via retail liquidity injection if real. But lots of “ifs”.
Crypto market rebounds broadly, signaling possible pivot — Major assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana and XRP are rallying after recent drag‑down. Could mark early stage of fresh up‑leg or merely a relief bounce.
Bitcoin inches higher as US shutdown progress aids sentiment — Macro developments (US government shutdown resolution) are spilling into crypto. Shows how sensitive crypto remains to non‑crypto macro factors.
Market Trendline
PRICE ACTION
Total crypto market cap is hovering between $3.5 and $4 trillion, with a modest uptick over the past 24 hours. Bitcoin dominance is steady in the 55–60% range. Sentiment is neutral-to-slightly bullish, but momentum is sluggish and volume is meh at best.
Notable Movers
Decred (DCR): Exploded ~35–40% in a single day. No obvious catalyst—this looks like a pure speculative rip.
Micro-cap flyers: A handful of low-volume altcoins (think “Useless Coin” tier) posted 25–30% gains. Fun for degens, meaningless for the broader market.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin and Ethereum continue to shadowbox near key levels with no real conviction in either direction.
Macro View
These altcoin spikes are textbook “rotation games” in a quiet tape.
No fresh narratives or macro tailwinds—just opportunistic trading.
The fact that majors aren’t following through hints at hesitation, not confidence.
Until volume kicks in or macro surprises, this is noise, not trend.
Bottom Line
This isn’t a bull run—it’s a reshuffling of risk. Big caps are parked, small caps are twitchy, and sentiment is cautiously optimistic but easily spooked. Without real follow-through, today’s pump is tomorrow’s dump.
The AI Race Just Went Nuclear — Own the Rails.
Meta, Google, and Microsoft just reported record profits — and record AI infrastructure spending:
Meta boosted its AI budget to as much as $72 billion this year.
Google raised its estimate to $93 billion for 2025.
Microsoft is following suit, investing heavily in AI data centers and decision layers.
While Wall Street reacts, the message is clear: AI infrastructure is the next trillion-dollar frontier.
RAD Intel already builds that infrastructure — the AI decision layer powering marketing performance for Fortune 1000 brands. Backed by Adobe, Fidelity Ventures, and insiders from Google, Meta, and Amazon, the company has raised $50M+, grown valuation 4,900%, and doubled sales contracts in 2025 with seven-figure contracts secured.
Shares remain $0.81 until Nov 20, then the price changes.
👉 Invest in RAD Intel before the next share-price move.
This is a paid advertisement for RAD Intel made pursuant to Regulation A+ offering and involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The valuation is set by the Company and there is currently no public market for the Company's Common Stock. Nasdaq ticker “RADI” has been reserved by RAD Intel and any potential listing is subject to future regulatory approval and market conditions. Investor references reflect factual individual or institutional participation and do not imply endorsement or sponsorship by the referenced companies. Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.radintel.ai.
How'd I do this week?
You made it to the bottom, congrats! I really appreciate you reading. If you enjoyed today’s content please share it with a friend and if you aren’t already subscribed please do!
DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.